Friday, May 25, 2007

Is the Food Fight Flourishing or Floundering?



When I spoke about the "Golden Opportunity" available for dairy farmers, I wasn't alone in my thinking. The recent week has provided a HUGE number of related news stories surrounding the issue of tainted food AND the concept of Local food.



I am impressed that it seems some action is taking place. But on this exploding issue, I have not seen anything in the media about the labelling and proposed, new regulations for cheese. That is not good. I sure hope dairy farmers are taking advantage of this window of opportunity, while it lasts!


There is a lot at stake. Much more than even I thought. We met with friends this week, who happen to live in Stoney Creek. (That is part and parcel of the Hamilton-Niagara belt, home to millions of people.) My friend has been subjected to my wrath about the whole China import issue as it pertains to our food. I wasn't sure she was listening. It turns out she was!


At a recent gathering of professional women, the issue of the cost of fresh local food came up. The subject was asparagus but it could have been any food grown in this country.

Apparently, for much of the winter asparagus was available, imported from the USA and Mexico for $1.49 a lb. The first local asparagus has hit the stores and the price is $2.79 a lb.! This is what generated the discussion she related to me.


So, as the discussion continued, my now very educated friend stated support for the locally grown asparagus, even with it's current price. She also told the other women her reasons ( food safety and not from this country). The conversation then turned to labelling and it turns out that NONE of those women had a clue about Made in Canada!!!! They thought that the "China" label on some frozen vegetables meant the plastic wrapper! I remind you all, that these are well educated, intelligent women. I knew the problem was bad but this blew me away.


Labelling and made in Canada regulations and import labels are obviously not well understood!


I rest my case. If the government can't/won't educate consumers, farmer MUST! It is imperative or they will drown under the imported products coming from other countries.


This also speaks to the issue of labelling for cheese. Dairy farmers must educate their consumers or they will not succeed with their battle on labels and regulations. There must be some profile to this or the message will NOT get out there.


How about fighting fire with fire? The processors have sent an 'open' letter to the Minister. Dairy farmers should emulate them and go one better... a simple, clear cut ad explaining to the public "why" they need this too!

Friday, May 11, 2007

Golden Opportunity Part II ????


I wrote the previous article about 5 days ago. My delay in publishing it has allowed events to over take this article but in an even MORE timely way! I feel very strongly about this issue and see the recent events as a way to make the concerns of supply management, the same concerns the public SHOULD have.

Clever marketing people or a good PR Firm should be able to package this stuff in a way to make the media and the public sit up and take NOTICE!!!!


Don't think I'm on the right track?

Take a look at these headlines AND articles from the last few days:

Environment Hamilton starts program to support area farmers, protect Ontario's Greenbelt


China arrests food managers


Food Safety at issue, local farming praised (Panel of experts stresses need for more locally grown, organic products in U.S. food supply)


Farmed Fish Fed Tainted Meal Same contaminate prompted pet food recall


120 fish farms sent contaminated feed


States Introduce Bill to Support Local Food Systems


U.S. legislators could side-swipe Canada with measures to protect food supply


U.S. puts Canada in firing line after food safety scare


Toxic Dyes and Preservatives Are Often Key Ingredients; Export Worries Widen


Nutrition Labels Not Accurate, Researcher Says


Shanghai to use mobile tests in food- safety blitz

Certainly the level of interest AND concern has gone way, way up. The story keeps on getting wider and other issues, including those important to dairy farmers, need to be connected to this widening public concern.


This week's Ontario Farmer had an another article that should be of interest to the public!


"Cheesed Off" Campaign launched against new cheese regs- Francis Anderson. The Dairy Processors Association of Canada (DPAC) is beginning a high profile battle against changes to the regs. This is just another side of the same food safety coin, as far as I am concerned. I WANT to know where it's from and what it is, if it is going into my food!


I do not believe that THIS TIME, Dairy Farmers of Canada (DFC), should let sleeping dogs lie.


DFC is the organization for producers who DO market milk! Research has shown they (farmers) are considered to be MORE trust worhty than business (processors or importers). They do take principled stands (BSE). The public needs to hear their voice on this issue!


Millions of dollars in free PR could be theirs for the taking, to advance "made in Canada" labeling and 100% Canadian dairy products. I have never seen a climate so perfect to raise the spectre of 'free trade" and it's ultimate impact for farmers and the public, than this one. -CG

Golden Opportunitiy For Dairy Farmers??


The recent pet food poisoning disaster has provided agriculture with a GOLDEN opportunity!! Every farm organization should be monitoring the news reports and finding ways to plug in.

I am blown away by the fact it was the death of pets that broke the story! Major food recalls and human illness has NOT exploded into the media like this story has. Perhaps it has more to do with the fact that the company imported something they could have bought in North America, that started it all.

Certainly, the almost daily exposure of the widening product list that was tainted with melamine is part of the issue. Articles and news stories about the government and the CFIA are starting to hit the air ways as well. Just last week, CTV had a major story about the issue and touched on the CFIA , the lack of standards for imported product and the fact that Canadian farmers must adhere to a higher standard for domestic food than imports from other countries.


This issue has been upsetting farmers for a long time. Every time the government has been questioned about this glaring in-equity, responses have been luke warm, at best. "Equivalency standards" for imported food has never been good enough, in the view of farmers. The public, however, did NOT understand this part of the issue and agriculture never seemed to be able to or want get that message out there!

A quick check of news stories on the CTV site brings up a lot of stuff, including some 'Special Reports' in the works. The subject matter is Food Safety and Food Security!

Since Dairy Farmers of Canada has been discussing this issue and trying to focus the political interest on this important topic, they need to start talking to CTV asap!

Currently, CTV is focusing on the 'Local" food movement and one man's attempt to inform Canadians about this issue. More needs to be done with the groups that represent farmers and the importance of keeping Canadian farmers viable in Canada, the crisis in some industries, the problems with the border and imports like MCP.

Milk Protein Concentrate (MCP) is in a dry form and so was wheat gluten. Without confirmation of sources, labelling laws, appropriate tariffs and standards, no one can confirm what this stuff is, in ice cream, cheese and who knows what else. The issue could & should receive front and centre media coverage.

After all, the pet food mess is all about consumer education and understanding of the problems ultimately involved with free trade. The cheapest source can have a cost people are not willing to pay.

The government reacts to public pressure and anything that will raise that bar, right now, is critical.

For more articles about this important issue, see Dariblawg del.icio.us


Sunday, May 6, 2007

Uh OH! Cheese in the news?


I can always tell when somebody has cranked someone else in the dairy business. Something shows up somewhere in the Globe & Mail! You really know you've hit a nerve when it shows up in the ROB section.


Even more instructive is the comments link at the bottom of the editiorial. Follow it and see for yourself.



Somebody goes to a great deal of effort to talk about the Belleville Cheese Exchange and the old days. Someone else is pretty upset and certainly doesn't understand the quota system in Supply management.

Mr. Strahl, it's not the Canadian whey
NEIL REYNOLDS
From Friday's Globe and Mail


May 4, 2007 at 5:53 AM EDT


OTTAWA - Like Little Miss Muffet, Canadians have been consuming their curds and whey - and helping the environment at the same time. By choosing "light" cheeses at the supermarket, products that recycle whey, Canadians have exponentially increased the country's consumption of a waste product traditionally bereft of commercial uses. Since residual whey is a significant industrial pollutant, this marketplace adaptation has produced a fine symbiotic relationship. Fewer calories for people. Less wastes for industry.


In this allegorical construct, the next character we encounter should be the Spider. Enter Agriculture Minister Chuck Strahl as Spiderman. When Mr. Strahl addressed a convention of dairy farmers in February, he announced that he had directed federal food regulators "to launch a regulatory process related to the compositional standards for cheese." He had taken this action, he said, "to protect consumer interests and to promote choice in the marketplace


For the complete story see....... Mr. Strahl, it's not the Canadian whey -CG


Wednesday, May 2, 2007

China's Food Issues Just Keep On......

Here we go with more stuff in the mainstream media. Some of the players are the same here in Canada. These are just glimpses into the complicated food system that has developed in North America. I think that is the largest shock to most consumers. They had no idea.-CG


Production trumps quality Apr 28, 2007 04:30 AM
China faces growing concerns over its exports in wake of tainted pet food, milk

Ariana Eunjung Cha
Special to the Star

SHANGHAI–Something was wrong with the babies.

The villagers noticed their heads were growing abnormally large while the rest of their bodies were skin and bones. By the time Chinese authorities discovered the culprit – severe malnutrition from fake milk powder – 13 had died.

The scandal, which unfolded three years ago after hundreds of babies fell ill in an eastern Chinese province, became the defining symbol of a broad problem in China's economy.
Quality control and product-safety regulation are so poor in this country that people cannot trust the goods on store shelves.

Until now, the problem has not received much attention outside of China. In recent weeks, however, consumers everywhere have been learning about China's safety crisis. Tainted ingredients that originated here made their way into pet food that has sickened and killed animals around the world, with nearly 4,000 deaths reported in the United States.

Chinese authorities acknowledge the safety problem and have promised repeatedly to fix it, but the disasters keep coming. Tang Yanli, 45, grandaunt of a baby who became sick because of the fake milk but eventually recovered, said that even though she now pays more to buy national brands, she remains wary.

"I don't trust the food I eat," she said. With China playing an ever-larger role in supplying food, medicine and animal feed to other countries, recognition of the hazards has not kept up.
By value, China is the world's No. 1 exporter of fruits and vegetables, and a major exporter of other food and food products, which vary widely, from apple juice to garlic to sausage casings.
China has been especially poor at meeting international standards.

The United States subjects only a small fraction of its food imports to close inspection, but each month rejects about 200 shipments from China, mostly because of concerns about pesticides and antibiotics and about misleading labelling.

Since 2000, some countries have temporarily banned whole categories of Chinese imports. The European Union stopped shipments of shrimp because of banned antibiotics. Japan blocked tea and spinach, citing excessive antibiotic residue. South Korea banned fermented cabbage after finding parasites in some shipments.

As globalization of the food supply progresses, "the food gets more anonymous and gradually you get into a situation where you don't know where exactly it came from and you get more vulnerable to poor quality," said Michiel Keyzer, director of the Centre for World Food Studies at Vrije University in Amsterdam, who researches China's exports to the European Union.

Chinese authorities, while conceding the country has many safety problems, have claimed other countries' assessments of products are sometimes "not accurate" and have implied the bans may be politically motivated, aimed at protecting domestic companies that compete with Chinese businesses.

China's State Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Health and Ministry of Agriculture – which along with other government agencies share responsibility for monitoring food and drug safety – this week declined to answer written questions sent to them via fax.

In the United States, more than 100 brands of pet food have been recalled since March 16 because of a spike in animal deaths, generally from kidney failure. The recall, one of the largest ever, included mass-market brands sold in stores like Safeway and Wal-Mart, as well as pricey brands sold by veterinarians and specialty retailers.

The FDA and a manufacturer in South Africa have found that several bulk ingredients shipped from China, including wheat gluten and rice-protein concentrate, were contaminated with an industrial chemical called melamine.

Last week, concern about animal safety transformed into a concern about risk to people.
California state officials said the industrial chemical melamine had been found in livestock feed at a hog farm and could pose a "minimal" health risk to people who ate pork from there.

The investigations are unearthing details of the food chain that were previously a mystery to most Americans, including the international dealings that determine how ingredients make their way into the food supply. U.S. companies are under relentless pressure to cut costs, in part from consumers who demand low prices, and obtaining cheap ingredients from China has become an important strategy for many of them.

In China, meanwhile, the government has found that companies have cut corners in virtually every aspect of food production and packaging, including improper use of fertilizer, unsanitary packing and poor refrigeration of dairy products.

William O'Brien, president of Hami Food of Beijing, which transports food for the McDonald's restaurant chain and other multinational companies in China, said in some of his competitors' operations, "chilled and frozen products very often come in taxi cabs or in vans – not under properly controlled conditions."

The Chinese government has undertaken a major overhaul of its monitoring system by dispatching state inspectors to every province.

Tuesday, May 1, 2007

The Myth of Free Trade



This film is making the rounds. I found an invitation to it in my mailbox. I am no fan of free trade, but I was truly shocked by some of the statistics and claims.-CG

From the Hoodwinked website:

All statistics are subject to interpretation, but our dependence on trade with the United States is regularly and deliberately exaggerated. Even an op-ed piece in the Globe and Mail by TVOntario's Dan Dunsky repeated the often-cited false assumption that "trade with the U.S. constitutes 52% of our GDP."


Here's a brief "reality check."


How dependent is Canada on exports to the United States?

Over 80 per cent of the Canadian economy is generated by internal, domestic transactions - Canadians producing, buying and selling among themselves.


Exports to the U.S. represent less than 17 per cent of Canada's economy and over 50 per cent of that is in oil, gas and raw materials.

After hundreds of years of trying to develop value-added industries in this country and get away from the "hewers of wood, drawers of water" dependence on extracting natural resources, NAFTA, through the proportional sharing clause, has encouraged a structural change in our economy, back to the old resource-dependent model.


"In 2005, for the first time in a generation, more than half of our total merchandise exports from Canada once again consisted of raw materials and natural resources." - Jim Stanford, Ph.D. economist.


Hoodwinked: the Myth of Free Trade


A film by Bill Dunn and Linda West


Guest speaker: David Orchard